Up next in 10
Ed Heimlich of Honorquest.org discusses official immunity as seen in the recent magistrate opinion in the federal case of Antonio Buehler v. The City of Austin, et. al., that arose from a arrest by Austin police for video recording them. The opinion is at http://cloudfront-assets.reason.com/assets/db/14063077544714.pdf Talk to the 7/28/14 meeting of Texans for Accountable Government at Sherlock's in Austin, Texas.
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
talking about sovereign immunity and uh
0:02
just the the the the way the state has
0:06
uh the legal the the esoteric legal
0:09
nature of why the state can uh move past
0:12
its constitutional boundaries so uh
0:15
without further further Ado here is Ed
0:17
heck thank
0:19
you hello fell ters and friends I'm Ed
0:22
heck I'm leading the honor Quest
0:25
initiative Antonio ber who here is
0:28
familiar with his
0:31
name and did you see this news about his
0:34
case yes Y and before you get too
0:37
excited about that I suggest you
0:40
carefully read the judges ruling in that
0:44
case fellow citizens do your right come
0:49
from a judge or from government no as
0:53
stated in our organic law July 4th
0:56
1776 a free people instinctively know
1:02
that we hold these truths to be
1:06
self-evident that people are endowed by
1:10
their
1:11
creator with unalienable rights in
1:14
organic law of
1:17
1836 the founders referred to these
1:20
rights as inherent in other words they
1:22
existed before
1:24
government government does not create
1:28
rights
1:30
government does not create people to the
1:33
contrary people create
1:36
government but there's a strong
1:40
tendency among
1:42
those who have been trusted with
1:46
positions in government to forget
1:50
self-evident
1:56
truths I call it Amnesia induced by
1:59
arrogance
2:00
a constitution and law secures rights
2:02
for those who become afflicted by
2:06
arrogant Amnesia when entrusted with
2:09
positions in
2:10
government I have read the 36 pages of
2:13
the ruling in the ber
2:17
case it is additional proof of the need
2:21
for our honor
2:23
Quest the suspension of our Texas
2:26
Constitution is confirmed in in that
2:31
opinion in that ruling on page 32 and I
2:33
quote Jeweler who asserts violations of
2:37
the search and seizure and due process
2:39
sections of the Texas
2:41
Constitution these sections do not
2:44
mention compensation or damages in any
2:46
respect and therefore do not provide a
2:49
private right of action for
2:52
damages did you get that the judge is
2:55
saying that the government can violate
2:57
the law found in our Texas Bill of
2:58
Rights
3:00
and there will be no consequences for
3:02
the
3:03
government he is saying the victim of
3:05
violations of fundamental
3:07
constitutionally secured human rights
3:10
has no right to
3:12
restitution and finally there's that
3:14
phrase private right of action for
3:18
damages it simply means a lawsuit in
3:21
violation of the open course provision
3:23
of our Texas Bill of Rights he's saying
3:26
that the court is
3:27
closed on those issues
3:30
it
3:31
continues the first the court First
3:33
turns to bu's claim for damages under
3:35
the Bill of Rights to the Texas
3:37
Constitution in light of the foregoing
3:39
the only viable damages claim he has
3:42
alleged is for the taking of his camera
3:46
in order to be compensated for a taking
3:49
under the Bill of Rights to the Texas
3:52
Constitution the taking must be for
3:55
public
3:58
use so you see the government does not
4:01
deny that it took bu's camera and did
4:04
not return it but the government
4:07
attorneys
4:09
say with the judge agreeed that bu has
4:13
no right to his camera or its return or
4:16
compensation for his property because
4:19
the camera was not taken for public
4:22
use when you see this ruling in Antonio
4:25
bu's case you see the reason honquest is
4:30
sounding the
4:32
alarm and giving notice that our Texas
4:34
Constitution has been
4:36
suspended many don't want to believe it
4:39
they refuse to believe it or simply
4:41
don't understand it here's what to tell
4:44
them all of you are familiar with
4:46
traffic laws you're reminded of them
4:48
every day you see speed limit signs you
4:50
see stop
4:53
signs now suppose the government decides
4:56
that violations of traffic laws
5:00
may not may not be prosecuted in our
5:02
courts the courts are closed what would
5:04
you say about the traffic law you'd say
5:06
they've been
5:08
suspended for all practical purposes
5:10
they have the laws and signs remain but
5:14
they're now just suggestions that
5:16
drivers can disregard with impunity
5:19
cause damage
5:21
injury and uh no one can get any
5:26
restitution Justice for them
5:31
that is what our legislature has done
5:33
with our Texas
5:35
Constitution we have a Bill of Rights
5:37
it's a big red stop
5:41
sign our constitution is a stop sign it
5:44
tells government to
5:46
stop when they want to search you or
5:49
search your
5:50
property it tells the government to
5:54
stop when they want to arrest you
5:58
without probable cause
6:01
it also mandates due process of law in
6:04
other words the sign says stop when they
6:06
want to subject you to a trial that's
6:09
just for show to get the appearance that
6:12
you had a fair trial when you did not to
6:15
give the appearance of guilt when you
6:17
were innocent now all these stop signs
6:20
remain in our
6:21
Constitution and in other laws but as
6:25
with the Antonio buer ruling our Texas
6:28
legislature has said it would cost too
6:32
much for the government to allow you to
6:35
do to the government what the government
6:37
does to
6:39
you you cannot prosecute or in other
6:41
words bring a
6:42
lawsuit against the government for
6:45
running any of these stop signs as a
6:49
result our government has become
6:51
Lawless and those who act in the name of
6:54
our government have become
6:57
dangerous what is most amazing
7:00
about what the legislature did in
7:04
2001 is that they also took away their
7:09
own
7:12
power when it
7:16
comes they're the ones that are supposed
7:18
to make laws that provide us with
7:21
additional protections but now their
7:24
laws have become just suggestions that
7:26
the executive and judicial division can
7:29
disre guard with
7:32
impunity
7:34
now
7:37
our of course when it comes to you and
7:39
your actions now they're going to hold
7:41
you accountable to the legislature
7:43
suggestions and on top of that if that's
7:46
not good enough the executive and
7:48
judicial division will create some of
7:50
their own to hold you accounted to even
7:52
though our constitution explicitly does
7:56
not give any lawmaking power to the
7:59
judge Judes the judicial division or the
8:01
executive
8:02
division the result of all this has been
8:04
billions in wasted
8:09
expenditures waste and LW from fraud and
8:12
Corruption that never appears in the
8:14
media worse than this is thousands of
8:17
lives destroyed by government free to
8:19
act without any consequences for
8:22
violating
8:23
inherent unalienable fundamental human
8:27
rights our Constitution and laws were
8:29
created to secure Michael Mor spent 25
8:33
years in prison because a prosecutor did
8:37
evidence of his innocence so that
8:39
prosecutor could Advance his career for
8:42
every Michael Morton you hear about
8:44
there's thousands maybe tens of
8:46
thousands that you will never hear
8:50
about you your tax dollars are paid for
8:56
the prosecution and incarceration of
8:59
your innocent fellow Texans and fellow
9:03
Americans ters and guest there is no
9:06
excuse for us to allow this to continue
9:10
those who established our first
9:12
constitutions did the hard
9:15
part there was no such thing as a
9:17
constitution and a Bill of
9:19
Rights binding the king of England and
9:22
those who acted in his name as
9:24
Government of our colonies they shed
9:27
blood to give us that
9:31
now we all we have to do is ask our
9:34
public servants to honor their oath to
9:37
preserve protect and defend our
9:39
Constitution and they can do
9:42
that by first of all repealing that
9:45
statute of 2001 that says that the
9:48
government of Texas is The Sovereign not
9:51
us the people and that the government of
9:53
Texas is
9:54
immune from suit or liability for any of
9:57
its wrongdoings its violation of our
9:59
constitutional law because it would cost
10:01
too
10:03
much so I'm asking you to join me in
10:07
this quest for
10:08
Honor do it for
10:11
yourself and visit our website honor
10:14
quest.org and send me an email with any
10:17
questions you
10:19
have thank you so
10:21
much one final thing please vote for me
10:24
to be on the steering committee at our
10:26
uh next meeting our anniversary party
10:28
thank you
10:30
so if you had any questions regarding
10:31
everything that was covered here at the
10:33
end of towards the end of our meeting
10:34
we're going to break out into micr
10:36
groups again if you were here at the
10:37
last meeting you could see it was the
10:38
first time we had ever done that and
10:40
they're going to be working sessions
10:41
around issues that you care about issues
10:43
that you're ready to get active with so
10:46
if you look on the agenda you'll see
10:47
that Ed is representing honor Quest so
10:49
at the end towards the end of our
10:51
meeting you can actually meet Ed and uh
10:53
do a working session with him so now I'm
10:56
so honored to
#Courts & Judiciary
#Human Rights & Liberties
#Public Policy