PIML 96061308 / Forwarded to Patriot Information Mailing List: [Vote NO on HR 3308.] PIML ================================================================== From: "Cravens, Roger D." Subject: HR-3308 and the United Nations Date: Wed, 12 Jun 96 17:39:00 EST In the past few weeks, the case against US Army Specialist Michael New has taken an interesting twist. It has been determined that the President of the United States does _NOT_ have authority to put us troops under authroity of the United Nations _OR_ any other government without the express written concent of Congress. The below bill will allow any sitting president to conduct any UN operations he/she deems appropriate with further consideration of Congress. Which means that Specialist New's argument that he was not authorized under military and constitutional law to obey his commanders from the President on down because it was an unlawful order would go out the window. Call your Congresman/Congresswoman and tell them to vote NO on this bill. Get us the hell out of the United Nations. Roger Cravens --------------------------------------------------------------------- 104th Congress H. R. 3308 As Introduced in the House Note: This document is the unofficial version of a Bill or Resolution. The printed Bill and Resolution produced by the Government Printing Office is the only official version. VERSION As Introduced in the House CONGRESS 104th CONGRESS 2d Session BILL H. R. 3308 TITLE To amend title 10, United States Code, to limit the placement of United States forces under United Nations operational or tactical control, and for other purposes. -------------------- IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES APRIL 24, 1996 Mr. Longley (for himself, Mr. Armey, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Cox of California, Mr. Spence, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Everett, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Herger, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. Hoke, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Jones, Mr. Kim, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Metcalf, Mr. Radanovich , Mr. Saxton, Mr. Talent, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, and Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on National Security, and in addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned -------------------- TEXT A BILL To amend title 10, United States Code, to limit the placement of United States forces under United Nations operational or tactical control, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the `United States Armed Forces Protection Act of 1996`. SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND CONGRESSIONAL POLICY. (a) Findings. - Congress finds as follows: (1) The President has made United Nations peace operations a major component of the foreign and security policies of the United States. (2) The President has committed United States military personnel under United Nations operational control to missions in Haiti, Croatia, and Macedonia that could endanger those personnel. (3) The President has deployed over 22,000 United States military personnel to the former Yugoslavia as peacekeepers under NATO operational control to implement the Dayton Peace Accord of December 1995. (4) Although the President has insisted that he will retain command of United States forces at all times, in the past this has meant administrative control of United States forces only, while operational control has been ceded to United Nations commanders, some of whom were foreign nationals. (5) The experience of United States forces participating in combined United States-United Nations operations in Somalia, and in combined United Nations-NATO operations in the former Yugoslavia, demonstrate that prerequisites for effective military operations such as unity of command and clarity of mission have not been met by United Nations command and control arrangements. (6) Despite the many deficiencies in the conduct of United Nations peace operations, there may be unique occasions when it is in the national security interests of the United States to participate in such operations. (b) Policy. - It is the sense of Congress that - (1) the President should consult closely with Congress regarding any United Nations peace operation that could involve United States combat forces and that such consultations should continue throughout the duration of such activities; (2) the President should consult with Congress before a vote within the United Nations Security Council on any resolution which would authorize, extend, or revise the mandate for any such activity; (3) in view of the complexity of United Nations peace operations and the difficulty of achieving unity of command and expeditious decisionmaking, the United States should participate in such operations only when it is clearly in the national security interest to do so; (4) United States combat forces should be under the operational control of qualified commanders and should have clear and effective command and control arrangements and rules of engagement (which do not restrict their self-defense in any way) and clear and unambiguous mission statements; and (5) none of the Armed Forces of the United States should be under the operational control of foreign nationals in United Nations peace enforcement operations except in the most extraordinary circumstances. (c) Definitions. - For purposes of subsections (a) and (b): (1) The term `United Nations peace enforcement operations` means any international peace enforcement or similar activity that is authorized by the United Nations Security Council under chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations. (2) The term `United Nations peace operations` means any international peacekeeping, peacemaking, peace enforcement, or similar activity that is authorized by the United Nations Security Council under chapter VI or VII of the Charter of the United Nations. SEC. 3. PLACEMENT OF UNITED STATES FORCES UNDER UNITED NATIONS OPERATIONAL OR TACTICAL CONTROL. (a) In General. - (1) Chapter 20 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 404 the following new section: Sec. 405. Placement of United States forces under United Nations operational or tactical control: limitation (a) Limitation. - Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), funds appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may not be obligated or expended for activities of any element of the armed forces that after the date of the enactment of this section is placed under United Nations operational or tactical control, as defined in subsection (f). (b) Exception for Presidential Certification. - (1) Subsection (a) shall not apply in the case of a proposed placement of an element of the armed forces under United Nations operational or tactical control if the President, not less than 15 days before the date on which such United Nations operational or tactical control is to become effective (or as provided in paragraph (2)), meets the requirements of subsection (d). (2) If the President certifies to Congress that an emergency exists that precludes the President from meeting the requirements of subsection (d) 15 days before placing an element of the armed forces under United Nations operational or tactical control, the President may place such forces under such operational or tactical control and meet the requirements of subsection (d) in a timely manner, but in no event later than 48 hours after such operational or tactical control becomes effective. (c) Additional Exceptions. - (1) Subsection (a) shall not apply in the case of a proposed placement of any element of the armed forces under United Nations operational or tactical control if Congress specifically authorizes by law that particular placement of United States forces under United Nations operational or tactical control. (2) Subsection (a) shall not apply in the case of a proposed placement of any element of the armed forces in an operation conducted by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (d) Presidential Certifications. - The requirements referred to in subsection (b)(1) are that the President submit to Congress the following: (1) Certification by the President that it is in the national security interests of the United States to place any element of the armed forces under United Nations operational or tactical control. (2) A report setting forth the following: (A) A description of the national security interests that would be advanced by the placement of United States forces under United Nations operation or tactical control. (B) The mission of the United States forces involved. (C) The expected size and composition of the United States forces involved. (D) The precise command and control relationship between the United States forces involved and the United Nations command structure. (E) The precise command and control relationship between the United States forces involved and the commander of the United States unified command for the region in which those United States forces are to operate. (F) The extent to which the United States forces involved will rely on forces of other countries for security and defense and an assessment of the capability of those other forces to provide adequate security to the United States forces involved. (G) The exit strategy for complete withdrawal of the United States forces involved. (H) The extent to which the commander of any unit of the armed forces proposed for placement under United Nations operational or tactical control will at all times retain the right - (i) to report independently to superior United States military authorities; and (ii) to decline to comply with orders judged by the commander to be illegal or beyond the mandate of the mission to which the United States agreed with the United Nations, until such time as that commander receives direction from superior United States military authorities with respect to the orders that the commander has declined to comply with. (I) The extent to which the United States will retain the authority to withdraw any element of the armed forces from the proposed operation at any time and to take any action it considers necessary to protect those forces if they are engaged. (J) The extent to which United States forces involved will be required to wear as part of their uniform any badge, symbol, helmet, headgear, or other visible indicia or insignia that indicates affiliation to or with the United Nations. (K) The anticipated monthly incremental cost to the United States of participation in the United Nations operation by the United States forces which are proposed to be placed under United Nations operational or tactical control. (e) Classification of Report. - A report under subsection (d) shall be submitted in unclassified form and, if necessary, in classified form. (f) United Nations Operational or Tactical Control. - For purposes of this section, an element of the Armed Forces shall be considered to be placed under United Nations operational or tactical control if - (1) that element is under the operational or tactical control of an individual acting on behalf of the United Nations for the purpose of international peacekeeping, peacemaking, peace-enforcing, or similar activity that is authorized by the Security Council under chapter VI or VII of the Charter of the United Nations; and (2) the senior military commander of the United Nations force or operation is a foreign national or is a citizen of the United States who is not a United States military officer serving on active duty. (g) Interpretation. - Nothing in this section may be construed - (1) as authority for the President to use any element of the armed forces in any operation; and (2) as authority for the President to place any element of the armed forces under the command or operational control of a foreign national.`. (2) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 405. Placement of United States forces under United Nations operational or tactical control: limitation.`. (b) Exception for Ongoing Operations in Macedonia and Croatia. - Section 405 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), does not apply in the case of activities of the Armed Forces as part of the United Nations force designated as the United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR) that are carried out - (1) in Macedonia pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 795, adopted December 11, 1992, and subsequent reauthorization Resolutions; or (2) in Croatia pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 743, adopted February 21, 1992, and subsequent reauthorization Resolutions. SEC. 4. REQUIREMENT TO ENSURE THAT ALL MEMBERS KNOW MISSION AND CHAIN OF COMMAND. (a) In General. - Chapter 37 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: Sec.656. Members required to be informed of mission and chain of command `The commander of any unit of the armed forces assigned to an operation shall ensure that each member of such unit is fully informed of that unit`s mission as part of such operation and of that member`s chain of command.`. (b) Clerical Amendment. - The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 656. Members required to be informed of mission and chain of command. ================================================================== * Patriot Information Mailing List * http://constitution.org/piml/piml.htm * A service to help inform those who have an active interest in * returning our federal and state governments to limited, * constitutional government * Send messages for consideration and possible posting to * butterb@sagenet.net (Bill Utterback). * To subscribe or unsubscribe, send message with subject line * "subscribe patriot" or "unsubscribe patriot" * Forwarded messages sent on this mailing list are NOT verified. * See World's Smallest Political Quiz: www.self-gov.org/quiz.html * Libertarian is to LIBERTY as librarian is to library (DePena) * PIML grants permission to copy and repost this message * in its entirety with headers and trailers left intact.